Skip to main content

Link it, Instead of Plagiarizing


By: Haroon Baloch


Online journalism has made plagiarism easier than ever, but believe me your efforts against the ethics would earn you bad. Link it, whatever you want to utilize in your blogs and online writings, is the best practice in the world of online journalism.

More or less, ethics for online journalism and traditional print media are same. With technological progression, especially internet's role of connecting with huge pool of knowledge, has given a new dimension to journalism in following ways:

  • Journalists enjoy the liberty to select information from anywhere.
  • Supporting stuff e.g. pictures, graphics and videos can also be accessed.
  • All types of information are readily available for the subscribers.
  • Information can easily be ascertained through various sources.

Ethics of Utilizing Graphics or Videos
However, ethics of utilizing stuff from other sources bind us to follow them. For example, I'm utilizing a picture to support my blog; I need to credit the original source in the caption. Same applies for the videos and graphics. Otherwise you're simply plagiarizing.

Here I mention one of the examples from my previous blog where I write on a morning show. I linked my writing with the original program video available in YouTube archives.

Linking for Reference
In 2003, To Link or To Not Link was a controversial debate. However, in 2012, online journalists widely believe linking the most effective way to prevent plagiarism.

While writing blog, sometimes I have information but to further strengthening my viewpoint, I search for similar viewpoint in others' writings and mention it along with its reference at the end or in the writing.

Only Refer to Authentic Info 
Linking where provides readers a new taste in the story, at the same time it requires more attention in referring your readers to authentic information.So be careful while referring them to another information.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pak Exaggerated Response to Rohrabacher's Resolution

By: Haroon Baloch Dana Rohrabacher, Californian legislature in House of  Representative  -  United News Pakistan. Republican congressman Dana Rohrabacher introduced a House Concurrent Resolution on February 17 th demanding the right of self-determination for Balochi nation. Earlier this month, US House of Representative's sub-committee on foreign affairs oversight and investigated the prevailing situation of Balochistan in view of human rights' violence. Pakistan responded furiously to the US government on this move of congressman and termed it interference in Pakistan 's internal affairs. Newly appointed ambassador to Washington , H.E. Sherry Rehman feared it may lead to further worsening of Pakistan – United States ties. Balochistan – southwestern province of Pakistan , rich with minerals and other natural resources, is the richest part of the country . Contrary to facts, Balochistan has seen no prosperity during the past 65 years. ...

Parliamentarians on Memogate Controversy

By: Haroon Baloch November 19, 2011 ISLAMABAD (Nov 19, 2011): As the claims of US businessmen-cum-journalist, Ijaz Mansoor of Pakistani origin strengthened post COAS Gen. Ashfaq Kayani's meeting with his Supreme Commander, President Asif Ali Zardari, it has developed into a "Memogate" controversy, which engulfed all political ventures for the time being. Parliamentarians have somehow different opinions about the controversy, but PML-N leading politician and one of the close aides of Mian Nawaz Sharif Khawaja Asif terms it as the mutiny against the nation as well as the army. "Don't be hesitant or ask me whether the implications include Article 6, be optimistic enough to call it a mutiny against nation and its army", Khawaja Asif said. He also said referring to ISI that some institutions have received all related evidences including the secret conversations of Mr. Husain Haqqani with Mansoor Ijaz as well as the blackberry codes. "Fire is set som...

Silencing dissent

May 9, 2017 By Haroon Baloch For some time now, I have been restricting my speech — which may otherwise be perfectly lawful — out of fear of being labelled a blasphemer or a traitor Never before now had I thought about my personal safety since friends and close acquaintances frequently advise me to be cautious in view of the increasingly intimidating atmosphere in the country. For some time now I have been restricting my speech, which may otherwise be perfectly lawful, out of fear of being labelled a blasphemer or a traitor. Critical and dissenting speech is rapidly being circumcised and criminalised in Pakistan, either through disproportionate laws or by vigilantism. Just a few days ago, a learned acquaintance posted a status on FaceBook whose tone was supportive of the controversial blasphemy laws without paying any attention to the various incidents of murder, lynching, and vandalism that have taken place in the name of these laws. The person is associated with the ...